DATA CURATION PRESERVATION ACTIVITIES: BUDGETS, COSTS, STAFFING AND SKILLS
When organisations commence data curation initiatives, they often focus on the exciting parts such as metadata tagging and building shiny new repositories. But long-term data preservation comes with a massive, often invisible tail of ongoing operational challenges. If you want your data to survive and remain useful five or ten years from now, then you will have to look past the technology and confront the two biggest icebergs in the room which are financial sustainability and human capital.
The Financial Reality: Budgets vs Actual Costs
Many organisations treat data preservation as a capital expense such as a one-time purchase of servers or cloud storage. However, in reality, preservation is a long-term operational expense which requires huge financial muscle, (Marimuthu, 2021). When building a data curation budget, organisations frequently overlook hidden expenses such as ingestion costs. These include issues such quality control, virus scanning and metadata enrichment before data even hits the archive. Another hidden cost is data egress fees. Cloud providers often charge hefty fees to retrieve your data or move it between systems, (Pasqui, 2024). Then we also have decommissioning. This is the complex, time consuming process of safely shutting down old software while extracting its data. In order to fix the issue of overlooking hidden costs organisations need to move away from short-term project grants or fluctuating annual IT budgets,(Bermes & Fauduet, 2011). Successful data preservation requires dedicated, ring-fenced operational funding models that account for data maintenance over its entire mandated lifecycle.
The Human Factor: Staffing and the Evolving
Skills Gap
You can buy the best preservation software in
the world, but it won’t run itself. Data curation is inherently a human
discipline, and finding and keeping the right talent is a major hurdle.
Finding individuals who possess all three
qualities is incredibly difficult, leading to a fierce talent war between
academia, government institutions and private enterprises.
How to Bridge the Gap: A Roadmap for the
Future
Overcoming these budget and staffing bottlenecks requires a strategic shift in how organisations view data departments. Human curators shouldn't spend their days manually tagging files. Leverage AI-driven metadata extraction tools to handle bulk curation tasks, allowing your skilled staff to focus on high-value governance, ethics, and quality control,(Prom, 2011) . The organisations should build data literacy pipelines internally. They should stop searching for the perfect external candidate and instead upskill current IT staff in archival science, or train library/information professionals in cloud data management. Finally organisations should adopt appraisal strategies. They should establish strict data appraisal policies to determine what data holds genuine long-term value and what can be safely deleted. Less data to preserve means lower costs and less strain on your staff.
Conclusion
Data curation isn’t a technical problem with a one-time software fix. Rather it is a continuous commitment. By acknowledging the real, ongoing costs of digital preservation and actively investing in multidisciplinary teams, organisations can ensure that their data remains an asset for the future, rather than a liability.
References
Bermès, E., & Fauduet, L. (2011). The human face of digital preservation: organizational and staff challenges, and initiatives at the Bibliothèque nationale de France. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(1), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i1.184
Marimuthu, F. (2021). Cost and management accounting fundamentals: a Southern African approach. Juta company limited . http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib
Nkwe, M & Ngoepe, M. (2021). Compliance with freedom of information legislation by public bodies in South Africa. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101567
Pasqui, V. (2024). Digital curation and long term digital preservation in libraries. JLIS.It 15(1) 109-125. https//doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-567
Prom, C. J. (2011). Preserving digital objects in institutional contexts: Sustainability and integration issues. Library Trends, 59(4), 725–740.
Sinclair, P., et al. (2011). Digital preservation and organisational readiness: Challenges in implementation. International Journal of Digital Curation. (Commonly cited in digital curation readiness literature)
Superb
ReplyDeletewell done
ReplyDeleteNice one
ReplyDeleteIt is indeed true that most organisations only consider Data curation when a need arises.Your post has enlighten me on the importance of treating Data curation as a long life project if organisations are to survive
ReplyDeleteA high-end system needs to be paired with a top-notch expert who can leverage on the technology's efficiency and effectiveness... well explained
ReplyDelete